Dana's profileCrossing the Divide...PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
February 24 Locked OutLocked Out Limited gender-neutral housing should go to those that need it Published On Friday, February 23, 2007 3:25 AM By THE CRIMSON STAFF Transgender students face unique, daily challenges, even at this famously liberal University. Students that do not identify with their biological gender—or even students questioning their gender but not ready to identify themselves publicly—are occasionally chased from bathrooms, forced to jump through desultory bureaucratic hoops, and sporadically snickered at from behind turned shoulders. Harvard has taken substantial strides to make life easier for its transgender students. Amending its non-discrimination policy to protect gender identity last year was a milestone, and the Committee on House Life's recent decision to make gender-neutral housing easier to obtain for transgender students—by including a transgender option in addition to the male and female categories on housing forms—is another step in the right direction. Many of these students will be far more comfortable in gender-neutral housing than in gender-segregated rooms. But such a policy fails to recognize that transgender students might feel more comfortable living with similarly-identifyi ng individuals, without having to disclose their transgender status. Harvard's current housing policy also fails to accommodate gay students who might feel more comfortable living with students of a different gender. Given all the potential complications and unique situations, the only equitable solution is for the College to offer gender-neutral housing to all of its students. Harvard's current gender-segregated housing policy for all but transgender students is outmoded, paternalistic, and ultimately unworthy of its rich progressive tradition. Undergraduates are mature enough to decide with whom they wish to live, be they male, female, or transgender. In fact, some students of different genders already live together completely harmoniously either in contravention of official policy or by opening fire doors between rooms. Moreover, concerns that have been raised about sexual assault ring hollow— colleges, such as the University of Pennsylvania, that have already moved to gender-neutral housing have not experienced increases in sexual assaults. According to current rules, gender-neutral suites must have locks on each bedroom door. While we believe this rule is unnecessary, the College should take the necessary steps to provide gender-neutral housing to every student. If that requires locks on every dorm room door, then so be it. In the interim, there are a limited number of gender-neutral suites available. We hope that the administration gives priority to students who would derive the greatest benefit from living in a gender-neutral room—transgender students. Prioritizing these students above others who desire gender-neutral housing is not an attempt to isolate students that do not fit within traditional gender roles but instead a pragmatic allocation of resources to those who would best be served by them. Ideally, transgender students at Harvard would not face a harsh and prejudicial climate. While the administration cannot undo stereotypes by fiat, it can and should create a more accepting environment by giving transgender students priority for gender-neutral housing. Copyright © 2007, The Harvard Crimson, Inc. http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517251 February 19 Eddie... steady... cookEddie's new show Eddie Izzard stars as former culinary king Nick Malone, a celebrity chef whose star is now more D-list than Michelin. With a mission to drink his way through his own wine cellar, a wife screaming abuse on his answer machine, and his staff fighting amongst themselves, food is the last thing on the menu at his Glasgow restaurant, Kitchen. <SCRIPT
language='JavaScript1.1'
SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N2998.Advertising.com/B2109678.6;abr=!ie;sz=300x250;click=http://servedby.advertising.com/click/site=0000721552/mnum=0000414178/optn=64?trg=;ord=5135279975?"></SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT><A
HREF="http://servedby.advertising.com/click/site=0000721552/mnum=0000414178/optn=64?trg=http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N2998.Advertising.com/B2109678.6;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=5135279975?"><IMG
SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N2998.Advertising.com/B2109678.6;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=5135279975?"
BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 ALT="Click
Here"></A></NOSCRIPT> But in case Ramsay, Oliver and their ilk will be watching on freeze-frame, with their lawyer on speed-dial, Izzard insists the show is not meant to take a dig at anyone. "It's not supposed to be any one chef's life - I think it is
influenced by all celebrity chefs or a certain bunch of them," he says.
"But people are fascinated by celebrity chefs and their egos. The
chef's the star, a bit like a star football player. What happens in a
kitchen, it's creative, it's tactile, it's tastebuds, it's very up
front, it's visceral. Cooking has to be flamboyant, there must be some
chefs out there who are shy, but you don't see them." February 16 11th Annual National Day of Silence sure to be loudStudents nationwide take part in a Day of Silence NEW YORK – Get ready for campuses all over the country to be a little quieter. On Wednesday, April 18, 2007 students nationwide will be commemorating the national Day of Silence. They will be quiet all day to protest the discrimination, harassment and abuse—in effect, the silencing—faced by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students and their allies in schools. The Day of Silence, a project of GLSEN, will be held during school hours. Over 6,000 participants are expected to be silent on April 18, wearing stickers and passing out `speaking cards' that read: "Please understand my reasons for not speaking today. I am participating in the Day of Silence, a national youth movement protesting the silence faced by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people and their allies in schools. My deliberate silence echoes that silence, which is caused by harassment, prejudice, and discrimination. I believe that ending the silence is the first step toward fighting these injustices. Think about the voices you are not hearing today. What are you going to do to end the silence?" GLSEN's 2005 National School Climate Survey found that more than 64% of LGBT students report verbal, sexual or physical harassment at school and 29% report missing at least a day of school in the past month out of fear for their personal safety. The Day of Silence is one way students and their allies are making anti-LGBT bullying, harassment and name-calling unacceptable in America's schools. About the Day of Silence The Day of Silence, a project of GLSEN, is a nationwide, student-led event during which thousands of high schools and colleges protest the oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. For more information and a complete collection of organizing materials, visit www.dayofsilence.org. Transgender Family Dynamics workshop at Univ. of VermontEvent date: February 24, 2007 The Advocate February 10, 2007 http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid41944.asp Theologian and writer Lisbeth Kellog and her family will present a workshop on Transgender Family Dynamics and a caucus titled "Family Experience" for the Translating Identity Conference at the University of Vermont, Burlington. The event is sponsored by the university as well as the school's Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, and Ally Alliance. The Kellog family, composed of Lisbeth (a transgender female); her wife, Deb; and their three children ages 10-17, will facilitate a panel workshop on the dynamics of living in a transgender family. Lisbeth Kellog is the bisexual representative on the board of directors of the Lutherans Concerned/North America and has written many articles on religion and LGBT issues. Deb Kellog is a German instructor at Normandale Community College in Bloomington, Minn. For more information on the event, including specific times, visit www.lcna.org or e-mail communications@lcna.org Advocate.com C 2007 PlanetOut Inc. All Rights Reserved. February 10 Pre-War Intelligence Acts `Inappropriate,' U.S. FindsFeb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Defense Department officials prepared pre-war intelligence reports that may have exaggerated links between Iraq and al-Qaeda, the Pentagon inspector general said today. Two offices set up under then-Undersecretary for Policy Douglas Feith before the March 2003 invasion of Iraq produced reports that formed the basis for the administration's key pre- war claim that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein might provide weapons of mass destruction to the terrorist group. These actions were authorized by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, Inspector General Thomas Gimble told the Senate Armed Services Committee. While ``not illegal or unauthorized,'' the actions ``were inappropriate'' because they didn't ``clearly show the variance with the consensus of the intelligence community,'' Gimble said. Committee chairman Carl Levin called Gimble's report ``devastating.'' Feith's operation produced what amounted to ``an alternative analysis,'' prepared ``without the knowledge of the intelligence community,'' that was used ``to back a decision to go to war,'' Levin said. The committee released only the two-page executive summary of Gimble's review, which was prepared at the request of Levin, Democrat of Michigan, and Republican Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Relationship Levin, 72, and other critics contend that assessments produced by the Pentagon office were skewed to portray an active pre-war relationship between Hussein and the al-Qaeda terrorist organization, while the intelligence community saw virtually none. Following the U.S.-led invasion, al-Qaeda operatives did become active in Iraq, targeting U.S. forces and helping to foment sectarian violence. ``The Feith office is the one that produced the key alternative analysis which provided that material,'' Levin said in an interview. ``It was key, it was vital, it was what the White House used to make the linkage to terrorist groups.'' Gimble cited a briefing given in September 2002 at the White House to National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff. The briefing, given without Central Intelligence Agency approval, purported a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that ``was not supported by the available intelligence,'' Gimble said. `Undercut' CIA Gimble said Feith's staff didn't present CIA findings and further ``undercut'' the intelligence community by presenting a slide that said ``there were fundamental problems'' with the way the CIA and other analysts assessed information about the alleged Iraq-Iran link. Levin said he planned to have his staff pursue this meeting, which came as the Bush administration was building the case for war that it would present to Congress and the United Nations. He said he would have his staff interview the Feith analysts who briefed Hadley and Libby and would seek interviews with these two officials as well. He didn't say whether he intended to question Feith. Feith, now a professor of national security policy at Georgetown University in Washington who's writing a book on the Iraq war, said the report shows ``everything we did was lawful and authorized and we did not mislead Congress.'' ``The issue of the appropriate process for policy people to use to criticize intelligence work is minor compared to the key conclusions,'' Feith said in a written statement. In an interview with CNN today, Feith disputed the notion that he and other Pentagon officials had done intelligence work, saying they had merely offered critical assessments of the work done by intelligence agencies. `Errors the CIA Made' ``The CIA was doing things that people in the Pentagon thought was substandard,'' Feith told CNN. ``We are in trouble in Iraq because of errors the CIA made.'' Feith said he stood by the assertion that Saddam Hussein had links with al-Qaeda, as outlined by then-CIA Director George Tenet in 2002. The alleged link, since called into question, became a key argument for the U.S. invasion in March 2003. Republicans on the committee often disagreed strongly with Levin and the report's findings. ``I strongly disagree,'' Christopher Bond of Missouri, said. ``How can something that is `authorized' and `legal' also be `inappropriate?' That doesn't pass the common sense test.'' `Turf Battle' James Inhofe of Oklahoma dismissed most of Gimble's report as depicting a ``turf battle'' between competing bureaucrats. ``These matters have been scrutinized at least three times in the last three years by bipartisan, nonpartisan groups,'' Inhofe said. The Senate Intelligence Committee, for example, ``unanimously reported that it found that this process, the policy-makers' probing questions, actually improved the CIA's process,'' he said. Said Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss: ``I'm trying to figure out why we are here. We are beating this horse one more time.'' Gimble, in his summary, said that, in future, the Pentagon's closer relationship with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, set up in 2005, will ``significantly reduce the opportunity for inappropriate conduct of intelligence activities outside of intelligence channels.'' White House spokesman Dana Perino told reporters today she couldn't describe the relationship between Feith and President George W. Bush but that Bush ``has long acknowledged that the intelligence leading up to the war in Iraq was inaccurate.'' Pentagon Response Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Karen Finn, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said ``these matters have been scrutinized at least three times in the last three years by bipartisan and non- partisan groups,'' and now the Pentagon Inspector General has concluded that the activities of Feith's office `` were legal and authorized.'' Defense Secretary Robert Gates responded ``I have a problem with that,'' when Levin asked his views on the Feith operation during Gates' confirmation hearing in December. Levin said the report is valuable because it casts new light on the material the administration used to justify the war. ``If we are not going to repeat the mistakes of the past, there has got to be accountability,'' Levin said. ``You just repeat mistakes if there is no looking back and trying to find out what the facts were and holding people accountable the best way we can.'' February 09 Dani Bunten Berry makes the Hall of FameDani, I'm so glad you've been recognized for all the awesome efforts that were initiated by you! Miss you!! Multiplayer games are getting so popular -- see the 2.4 million games World of Warcraft sold recently in one day -- that it's hard to think back to where it all began. But there was a time when it was just an idea in the head of game designer Dani Bunten Berry.
Bunten, who died in 1998, is credited with creating one of the first multi-player video games called M.U.L.E. in 1983, well before the Internet and broadband helped link players around the world in epic virtual contests. Bunten's imagination helped eventually shape the face of video gaming, inspiring luminaries like designers Will Wright and Sid Meier. Now, nine years after her death from cancer, Bunten has been named today to the Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences Hall of Fame, the 10th such honoree joining Wright, Meier and other legends like Shigeru Miyamoto of Nintendo fame. Bunten was never a huge commercial success, at least not by today's standards. But her titles were innovative and opened the door for a more community and social-oriented approach to gaming. The most influential game was M.U.L.E, (Multiple Use Labor Elements) published by Electronic Arts. The game allowed players to work a plot of land, competing against and cooperating with other players in a sort of virtual economy. It opened the door for more real world games that could appeal to players beyond the hardcore set. Games like Meier's Civilization and Wright's The Sims all owe a debt to Bunten's philosophy. "Ask most game designers what their favorite computer game of all time is," said Wright, in an interview with Salon, "and you'll get M.U.L.E. as an answer more often than any other title." Richard Hilleman, Dani's last producer at Electronic Arts said gaming world takes for granted many of the quiet contributions of Bunten and his vision for the industry. "Dani was remarkable because she was focused on the kind of gaming that has become our future," said Hilleman. "Community-oriented gaming like massively multiplayer online games, things like Xbox Live and Xbox Arcade and social gaming like the Wii, this is the world Dani was playing in 20 years ago." Bunten's life, like the industry she helped shape, underwent a lot of changes and turmoil. After her third marriage failed, Bunten, who was born Daniel Bunten, underwent sex reassignment surgery in 1992. She continued to work on games until her death in 1998 to lung cancer, but maintained a quiet profile in her final years. February 06 GLAAD Calls On Paris Hilton to Explain....GLAAD Calls On Paris Hilton to Explain, Apologize for Anti-Gay, Racial Slurs In Video February 2, 2007 Contact: Marc McCarthy, Senior Director of Communications Phone: (323) 634-2051 Email: mccarthy@glaad.org http://www.glaad.org/media/release_detail.php?id=3965 Los Angeles, Friday, February 2, 2007 -- The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) today called on Paris Hilton to explain and apologize to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) and African American communities for her use of anti-gay and racial slurs in a video that began circulating on the Web earlier this week. The video, which appears to have been taken by an amateur videographer at a private party, shows Hilton referring to someone using the "F-word" and referring to herself and her sister, Nicky (who also calls a man the "F-word" in the video), by saying, "We're like two [N-word]s." In one stream of insults, Paris Hilton says,"[Expletive deleted] hoodlum, broke poor bitch from, like, Compton." The date of the video is unknown. "Access Hollywood" reports that it "appears to be several years old," while ITV reports that the "video was filmed at a recent party." "When Paris Hilton utters these words into a camera, it creates a permanent record that -- regardless of when it occurred and because it has been made public -- she must bear responsibility for," said GLAAD President Neil G. Giuliano. "These are not frivolous words, and to use them as if they are gives tacit sanction to the racism and homophobia they engender. Hilton has an obligation to go on the record, explain herself, and publicly apologize to the LGBT and African American communities and all those offended by these slurs." About GLAAD The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) is dedicated to promoting and ensuring fair, accurate and inclusive representation of people and events in the media as a means of eliminating homophobia and discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. For more information, please visit www.glaad.org. ### To view the video, please click here http://www.ifilm.com/video/2818928 |
|
|