Dana's profileCrossing the Divide...PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
|
June 13 Congratulations Chaz Bono!!Read the story here http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525869,00.html
and remember to send your support.
-Dana October 24 Talking about LA Observed: Mike Penner returns to Los Angeles Times
Quote LA Observed: Mike Penner returns to Los Angeles Times September 28 Talking about Memorial dedicated to slain gay student - Crime & courts- msnbc.comMemorial dedicated to slain gay student - Crime & courts- msnbc.com May 24 Going home againI read this brief but powerful article which has a heartfelt focus on survival in the face of adversity. . .
DANIELLE KING Friday, May 23, 2008 May 11 Heads up and Happy Mother's DayMegan Wallent's interview will air tonight at 8:00 on the Radical Trannies - Tune in to Ethan and Megan discussing her transition, life and other cool stuff.
Here's the link...
Happy Mother's Day!
-Dana April 10 Focus on Positive ChangeAs I read this extremely moving memorial about Bill Clayton a bisexual teen who passed back in 1995, I was reminded that we still have such a tremendous journey ahead of us before we are safe from hatred and predjudice.
Focus your efforts on possitive change.
Support equality and eliminate hatred through positive example.
Can we wait any longer?
-Dana March 08 7 Things Never to Say to LGBT CoworkersBy Daryl Hannah. Date Posted: March 07, 2008
For most, coming out at work is not an easy task. You can't be sure
how your company or peers will respond to your revelation. And despite recent reports that the workplace is growing increasingly accepting to LGBT employees, people often don't know how to welcome a colleague who recently came out the closet. PricewaterhouseCoopers executive Stephanie Peel's history is a
corporate America coming-out success story. When she came out professionally nearly 10 years ago, she was welcomed by her colleagues. "I came out personally in 1997 and came out professionally in 1999. Fortunately, I never heard anything not positive," says Peel. Peel now serves on the company's LGBT-partner advisory board, which
consists of 10--12 leaders in the firm who are LGBT, and provides guidance to the management committee to help further advance initiatives and activities. PricewaterhouseCoopers is No. 12 on The 2007 DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity(R) list and No. 2 on the Top 10 Companies for GLBT Employees. "I often tell people who ask me about this [that] it's not just about
what you can't say or shouldn't say because sometimes I find that colleagues feel stymied in that they shouldn't say anything at all. There is a lot of room for the things you can say to give clues to people that you are inclusive and culturally sensitive," warns Peel. So what are 10 things should you NEVER say to your LGBT colleagues?
Here's what GLSEN (the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network), Out & Equal Workplace Project, and Peel suggest: No. 1: "I suspected you were gay."
Although it is a common response, it's insensitive and plays into stereotypes.
No. 2: "I'm sorry."
Why should you apologize for a colleague's orientation? This implies
judgment and can make the situation more difficult. Would you apologize for a person's ethnicity or gender? No. 3: "Why did you tell me that?"
It's important for people to bring their "whole selves" to work, and
coming out of the closet is certainly a part of who one is. "The notion of leaving a big part of your self at home and walking into work is like walking around with two types of shoes on," says Selisse Berry executive director of Out & Equal, an advocacy organization that provides services to companies, human-resource professionals, employee-resource groups and individuals. No. 4: "Which bathroom do you use?"
Transgender people often are asked what gender they are. Such
questions are inappropriate, warns Out & Equal. It is important to remember that gender identity is becoming an increasingly sensitive subject. No. 5: "We are not close enough for you to share that information with me."
Not all employees are interested in their coworker's personal lives.
If you feel a colleague may have shared too much information, you can simply say, "Thank you for telling me that," says Peel. No. 6: Referring to coworkers as "she-male."
There has been a lot of uproar these days over this phrase.
Transgender employees often are the brunt of culturally insensitive jokes and comments. No. 7: "What do you like to do in bed?"
Sexual questions and comments are always off-limits. Not only do you
run the risk of offending a colleague, you are also teetering the line of sexual harassment. It's important not to be confused between trying to understand someone's personal life and inappropriate sexual harassment, warns Kevin Jennings, executive director of GLSEN. (c) DiversityInc 2008 (R) All rights reserved.
The Many Faces Of Mara Keisling: The Death of United ENDA?by Marti Abernathey | March 7, 2008
Is one of the key players in the United ENDA movement, Mara Keisling,
signaling its death? Recently Keisling said: 'We have to show Barney Frank 220 votes,' she said. 'If we show
him 220 votes, nobody is going to work harder on this. The same with HRC… It's going to happen again next year. '- After ENDA, the Fighter's Resilient According to Donna Rose's blog :
3/1/2008 - They're currently planning to hold hearings in Congress
specifically about transgender workplace issues in April. Whereas original plans were to tightly control those hearings, Rep. Frank has largely turned over control of gathering the stories to NCTE/Mara Keisling (who's home in DC with pneumonia). Mara has been diligently working with many of us to identify potential speakers who can come to Washington DC to speak and I expect she'll be finalizing that to give to Barney shortly. Frank later emailed Rose and said:
3/5/2007 - "…at the request of Mara Keisling, I agreed to meet
with her to discuss the hearing. In fact, my office has met with several groups for input, but Ms. Rose's assertion that I "largely turned over control of gathering the stories to NCTE/Mara Keisling" is wholly baseless. In fact, the Committee on Education and Workforce has jurisdiction over this bill and therefore, the "control" was never mine to turn over. And while the blog referenced NCTE, the fact is, several groups have been working to identify potential witnesses –in fact, the ultimate decision about who is ultimately selected rests with subcommittee Chairman Rob Andrews and full committee Chairman George Miller, after consulting with me. On a later entry, Rose said:
During our conversation today HRC came up several times. Joe (Racalto,
Barney Frank's senior policy adviser) went out of his way to assure me that HRC is taking the lead in these hearings in many ways. As far as our community is concerned I'll take his word for it and let it all unfold…. It's interesting to timeline Keisling's comments about the Human
Rights Campaign (HRC): 05/23/2007
(concerning the Matthew Shepard Act)
The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) did an incredibly skillful and
professional job as a lead organization on lobbying for the bill.Their work and efforts were absolutely everything that any LGBT person could hope for–they really did ALL LGBT people proud. And they as individuals and as an organization are putting their hearts into transgender work and we should be very appreciative. - (posted to TGv Advocacy) In that same post she said about ENDA:
Our Allies: Years ago, we didn't have too many. We had to educate
and, yes, fight our way back into the LGBT movement. I know there are still imperfections and I know that some trans people are still skeptical. Yet, I can tell you without hesitation that the entire organized LGBT movement is with us now. Our education worked. Our indignation worked. It is our moral responsibility now to embrace the people we asked and demanded to be our allies. If we do not believe in education, in persuasion, in redemption, we have no right being in civil rights. Why educate if not to win over? Why win over if not to embrace and move forward together? HRC really is an LGBT organization now and getting a lot of great work done for us all. Congressman Frank and Senator Kennedy too. Let's move on together. - (posted to TGv Advocacy) 7/1/2007
(concerning protesting)
Anyone (and again I am not saying you are suggesting this) who
would still hope to positively impact ENDA or LLEHCCPA by protesting allies who are really getting the job done for and with us–allies like HRC, Rep. Frank and Sen.Kennedy–in my opinion, simply would not be seeing or else not understanding what is going on. - (posted to TGv Advocacy) 10/10/2007
We consider this action a kind of 'family intervention'. We
believe that HRC is misguided in their response and lack of action on the ENDA legislation. While we appreciate the support that HRC has given us in the transgender community, we are disappointed with HRC at the moment, - Transgender Activists Protest HRC Dinner 10/13/2007
(concerning HRC's "brokering" of the inclusive ENDA [2015] putting it off to be heard in the future "when it has the votes to pass.") HRC's 'new deal' is entirely spin meant to undermine the
unprecedented grassroots efforts of hundreds of organizations and tens of thousands of individuals in order to allow movement of their vanity bill that no one including Speaker Pelosi or Congressman Frank says they really want. - NCTE's Daily Update 01/24/2008
'Our official position right now is we are extremely disappointed
and angry at HRC. … The real bottom line is right now NCTE will not do anything that will rehabilitate HRC as a legitimate spokesman for transgender people … until they stop actively hurting trans people', said Keisling. She characterized HRC's advocacy of the sexual orientation-only version of ENDA in the House, as well as its expected lobbying to pass the bill this year in the Senate, as hurting trans people. As for NCTE's future plans for ENDA, Keisling said that after the
election she expects advocates to lobby a new Congress and a new president in favor of passing a trans-inclusive ENDA bill. 'It is our expectation that in 2009 Congress is going to hear from
a very united LGBT movement,' said Keisling. 'Whether that includes HRC I have no idea.' - Trans-HRC schism widens 3/5/2008
'We have to show Barney Frank 220 votes,' she said. 'If we show
him 220 votes, nobody is going to work harder on this. The same with HRC… It's going to happen again next year.' - After ENDA, the Fighter's Resilient As recent as yesterday, HRC was lobbying for a non-inclusive ENDA.
In an email from Cuc Vu to the HRC Steering Committee, she writes: Lobby ask:continue to build support in the House for HR 2015;
request the Senate to take action to prohibit workplace discrimination. Since the non-inclusive bill (3685) has already passed the House,
asking the Senate to take action to prohibit workplace discrimination is asking them to support 3685. Essentially it's business as usual for HRC. Nothing has substantially changed in their lobbying efforts. They've had no "rehabilitative" moment or change of heart. If you take Keisling's words to heart, the only other conclusion that seems logical is that United ENDA is dead. March 01 Tuesday, March 4th: Transgender Rights HearingHere's an essential public hearing everyone should know about in terms
of making sure Massachusetts is a state that truly stands for civil rights for all. Transgender rights activists are preparing to state their case for
legislation that would protect transgender people from discrimination and hate crimes as a bill moves through the State House. The bill, scheduled for public hearing March 4, follows the model
of 13 other states that have legislation specifically protecting the civil rights and safety of transsexuals, said Daniel Glasser, aide to Rep. Carl Sciortino, a Medford Democrat who sponsored the bill. The transgender rights bill is the first piece of statewide
legislation to address transgender rights, though some Massachusetts towns and counties have ratified similar anti-discrimination laws, Glasser said. Rep. Byron Rushing, who introduced the bill with Sciortino in Jan.
2007, said it is important for Massachusetts to explicitly include transgender people in the state's anti-discrimination laws. "Transgender people represent a category of people who have been
discriminated against, but are not always covered by the existing discrimination laws," he said. "This bill is a way to make sure Massachusetts maintains its record of consistently protecting people who are victims of discrimination." Unfortunately, since the election I'm working on is actually on
Tuesday, I won't be able to attend this - but it's imperative the bill passes, so I urge everyone to a) call their state reps and senators and b) if you can, show up to the hearing, which is public and likely open for public comment. Mass Resistance and their folks will very likely be at this event, so it's important that we show a strong show of force so our elected leaders know this is an issue that Massachusetts citizens care about deeply. It's very important that, in Massachusetts, no one is left behind. February 25 Clinton and Obama Speak About Lawrence KingWe were anxiously hoping they would do so, and today they did. Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama have released statements regarding hate-crime slain Lawrence King. King was murdered in his Oxnard junior high classroom for being openly gay. All of the country has been outraged over the incident, and the two Democratic presidential candidates have finally spoken about the atrocity. From Senator Hillary Clinton:
"I was deeply saddened by the recent death of 15-year-old Lawrence
King who was killed at his school in Oxnard, CA. No one should face intimidation or violence, particularly at school, because of their sexual orientation or the way they express their gender identity. We must finally enact a federal hate crimes law to ensure that gay, lesbian and transgender Americans are protected against violent, bias-motivated crimes. We must send a unified message that hate-based crime will not be tolerated." From Senator Barack Obama:
"It was heartbreaking to learn about Lawrence King's death, and my
thoughts and prayers go out to his family. King's senseless death is a tragic example of the corrosive effect that bigotry and fear can have in our society. It's also an urgent reminder that we need to do more in our schools to foster tolerance and an acceptance of diversity; that we must enact a federal hate crimes law that protects all LGBT Americans; and that we must recommit ourselves to becoming active and engaged parents, citizens and neighbors, so that bias and bigotry cannot take hold in the first place. We all have a responsibility to help this nation live up to its founding promise of equality for all." "Equality for all," unless, as Queerty.com points out, you are talking about marriage rights.... February 22 Transgender law at riskPetition may send Montgomery County measure to referendum
Source: Equality Maryland
by Rona Marech
Thursday, February 21, 2008 A Montgomery County measure intended to protect transgender people appears headed to a voter referendum, setting up a potentially divisive debate over how far anti-discrimination laws should extend. The recently passed law protects transgender people from
discrimination in housing, employment, public accommodations, and taxi and cable service, and was supposed to go into effect yesterday. But it is on hold after opponents gathered 32,000 signatures in a bid to put it on the ballot this fall. Citizens for a Responsible Government, the group that paid for
thousands of computerized calls to county households to further the petition drive, says the measure infringes on the privacy of most citizens while protecting just a few. "Our primary objection is the impact this has on every other citizen
in Montgomery County," said Michelle Turner, a spokeswoman for the group. "This legislation affects or was written for less than 1 percent of the population, with total disrespect for the safety, well-being and rights of everyone else." Public restrooms, for example, will no longer offer real privacy for each gender, the group says. But officials say the new law, which the County Council passed
unanimously and County Executive Isiah Leggett signed, does not force changes at public restrooms. Furthermore, they say the bathroom issue is an old scare tactic that unfairly takes attention away from the measure's point: to protect people whose internal sense of gender and biological gender at birth do not match. "Have you ever heard of this being a problem anywhere? No, because
transgender people are going to use the bathroom where they're going to be the safest and where they're going to blend in the most. They're used to being subjected to discrimination and violence. And they have no interest in making other people uncomfortable," said Dan Furmansky, director of Equality Maryland. "It's a common-sense bill about helping people live their lives." Once viewed as a relatively straightforward matter of biological
category, gender has evolved into a far more complicated subject. Transgender is an umbrella term that can include transsexuals as well as people with a fluid identity that transcends traditional gender categories. Montgomery County and Baltimore City are among about 95
jurisdictions and 13 states that have passed laws protecting transgender people, and the General Assembly has considered extending the protections across Maryland. Such a state bill failed by one vote in a Senate committee last
year; the Maryland Commission on Human Relations is working to introduce a similar bill this year, Furmansky said. Since last spring, three states have passed transgender anti-bias
laws, and Gov. Martin O'Malley has issued an executive order that protects state employees from discrimination based on gender identity and expression. In 2002, when O'Malley was Baltimore's mayor, the City Council
unanimously passed its own version of a transgender anti-bias law. About a dozen people have filed complaints with the Baltimore Community Relations Commission since then, according to commission director Alvin O. Gillard, but the bathroom problems that Montgomery County critics have forecasted have not come to pass. "If you're committed to fairness and equality, you can find a way to
accommodate everyone and protect their privacy," Gillard said. "It's disappointing to know that you're refighting battles that you thought that you'd already won." Last year, the House of Representatives approved a bill barring
discrimination against workers based on sexual orientation, but backers removed a provision covering transgender persons to help pass the measure. New York and San Francisco are among the cities that have adopted
such protections for transgender persons, and students at some colleges have pushed successfully for gender-neutral restrooms that do not have urinals. The Montgomery County Council removed more explicit wording
addressing the issue. The law now reads that the requirements do "not apply to
accommodations that are distinctly private or personal." Turner says the language addressing access to restrooms or locker
rooms is too vague, but Patrick Lacefield, a Leggett spokesman, disagreed. In the county's view, the bill provides an adequate exemption that would allow businesses or other entities to restrict the use of facilities, he said. To spur interest in a referendum, the group sent messages to most
Montgomery County homes in recent days, said Turner, an effort that cost more than $10,000. They need 25,000 signatures -- a goal that appears within reach based on the percentage of signatures that have been certified. The measure's sponsor, County Council member Duchy Trachtenberg,
said she is "disappointed" by the opponents' campaign. "I think it's really unfortunate that a campaign of misinformation
and bigotry has found its way into this wonderful community and county," she said. Jim Morris of Kensington helped collect the signatures. "It's basic common sense," Morris said. "I wouldn't want a guy
dressed as a woman in the same bathroom as my daughter. That's not so much to ask." But people such as Maryann Arnow, a transgender woman who lives in
Germantown, sees such rhetoric as inflammatory. "The scary part to me is there is no current federal or state
legislation that provides people like myself any recourse whatsoever," she said. If the measure is overturned, she added, "it has the possibility to continue to make things more difficult for people like myself." December 20 Does the Christmas Season depress you?Hi all,
Dana here; does the Christmas season depress you?
If it does, then you're not alone. Many of us feel the blues this time of year and it's OK.
As for me, Christmas is a season of mixed emotions. The excitement that my daughter displays as the jolly bearded wonder's visit approaches is powerful enough to heal the deepest wounds, yet it is also a time of deep reflection for me. I've been told time and again that I'm way too introspective. Both personally and professionally, I really think being a transgender and all the associative years of "living in my head" is likely to blame for this.
Either way, that's where I am tonight.
When I was younger... much younger actually, Christmas was a wondrous time for forward thinking. I am, unfortunately, one of those folks who can pretty easily recall not only memories of days long gone but also minutest emotional details that often are much better left to disintegrate gracefully with time.
During these earlier Christmas's I would silently ponder those questions that I think we all asked ourselves...
What will I be when I grow up?
Where will my life bring me?
Am I truly able to become anything I want?
I remember the years past where those questions where answered with such unrealistic enthusiasm. I remember the years when the answers contained little hope for any future at all. Somehow, I made it through all of these times. And I'm glad I did. I also remember the more recent times when the fears of my approaching challenge had me fast frozen. Coming to the agreement with ourselves that we are "what we are" I feel is perhaps the most important revelations that we can have. I know I spent years hoping that I would be able to evade those challenges...
Living here, on the other side of transition, I feel somewhat "aged". And if anyone glances back up at my photo and agrees with me, well I'll get even; trust me! Seriously, somewhere over the years and throughout transition my perspective changed. I no longer seem to look to the future with a predictive disposition but rather a retrospective one. I try to make sense of it's direction and their intermediate destinations.
This year, I am hopeful and perhaps with any luck this will become a persistent trend.
I'll ask this question of you again... Does the Christmas season depress you?
Write me if you'd like to chat, no-one should feel alone during the holidays.
Love always,
Dana November 18 Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat itThe Transgender Day of Remembrance is intended to raise public awareness of hate crimes against transgender people, an action that current media doesn't perform. Transgender Day of Remembrance was set aside to memorialize those who were killed due to anti-transgender hatred or prejudice (trans-phobia). Day of Remembrance publicly mourns and honors the lives of transgender people who might otherwise be forgotten. Through this vigil, we express love and respect in the face of national indifference and hatred. Day of Remembrance gives transgender people and their allies a chance to step forward and stand in vigil, memorializing those who have died by anti-transgender violence.
The event was founded by Gwendolyn Ann Smith, to honor Rita Hester, whose murder in 1998 kicked off the "Remembering Our Dead" web project and a San Francisco, California candlelight vigil in 1999. Since then, the event has grown to encompass memorials in hundreds of cities around the world.
Rita Hester's murder — like most anti-transgender murder cases — has yet to be solved.
Although not every person represented during the Day of Remembrance self-identified as transgender, each was a victim of violence based on bias or prejudice against transgender people. The list of deaths which is posted on this site only contains those deaths known to the transgender community or that have been reported to the media. I would like to remind my trans brothers and sisters that this year's event is being held at the Arlington Church in Boston at 7:00pm. I hope to see you there! On a personal note: This year, I will be lighting a candle in remembrance of and speaking out for a friend of mine who took her own life after being attacked and brutally beaten while out with a gay/lesbian support group. -Dana
October 26 ENDA Bill sans Equality Passes E & L CommitteeThe House Education and Labor Committee passed a version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act ( ENDA ) that protects only sexual orientation and not gender identity on Oct. 18. The full House is expected to take up the measure this week. The bill passed the committee with the support of 23 of 27 Democrats and 4 of 22 Republicans. The Democrats voting "no" did so because it did not include protection for transgender persons. They were Rush Holt ( New Jersey ) , Yvette Clarke ( New York ) , Linda Sanchez ( California ) and presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich ( Ohio ) . Social conservatives on the committee offered four amendments to further weaken the bill, but they went nowhere. Earlier in the week, on Oct. 16, the only open lesbian in the House, Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., announced that the Democratic leadership would allow her to offer an amendment on the floor that would restore the gender identity provision. "I have never wavered from my conviction that the Employment Non-Discrimination Act must include protections base on sexual orientation and gender identity," Baldwin said in a statement released by her office. "We are greatly disappointed that the committee chose to move forward with a bill that is not endorsed by a single LGBT organization," said Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality. "It is historically unprecedented that Congress would pass a civil rights bill that the civil rights community€ ’·including those it is meant to protect€ ’·does not want." "This process has put members [ of Congress ] in the position where they think they might have to vote against the first piece of pro-gay rights legislation ever. That's the tragedy of this situation." said Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, in an interview with CBS News on Logo. "We oppose this legislation; we hope it never comes up for a vote without transgender inclusion," he continued. "We are putting our allies in a situation; we should not be here. The answer is either yank the bill or pass an inclusive bill." "Two weeks ago, our community was told that gender identity would not be included in any version of ENDA. Congressional leadership expected our community to acquiesce," United ENDA said in a news release. The coalition of about 300 national, state, and local LGBT groups had come together as a result of that attempted fiat by the Democratic leadership. "It is because of our unprecedented efforts that new options, such as the proposed amendments by Rep. Baldwin are able to come before Congress." "Now our community must focus our full attention on the upcoming floor vote on ENDA and building support for Rep. Tammy Baldwin's amendment that would make this bill fully inclusive of the entire GLBT community," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign. National Stonewall Democrats Executive Director Jon Hoadley said, "We appreciate that Congressional leaders like Congresswoman Baldwin continue to share our commitment to pass an inclusive bill, and we expect Speaker Pelosi and the House leadership will actively support the Baldwin amendment." Foreman said the Senate is not going to pass the bill this year, and George Bush is not going to sign it. "We've put our community through this wrenching, divisive debate over the last three weeks for an absolutely nothing but a symbolic vote." http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=16427 October 24 Will ENDA be Vetoed?Of Course!
In its first statement on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act
which would protect gays and lesbians in the workforce the White House said Tuesday the bill is likely unconstitutional and that if it passes in Congress the president's senior aides would recommend vetoing it. "[The bill] is inconsistent with the right to the free exercise of religion
as codified by Congress in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)," the White House said in a statement. The House is expected to vote on ENDA, along with an amendment that would
extend protections to include gender identity on Wednesday. The White House raised what it called two examples of how ENDA would violate
the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. "For instance, schools that are owned by or directed toward a particular
religion are exempted by the bill; but those that emphasize religious principles broadly will find their religious liberties burdened by H.R. 3685. A second concern is H.R. 3685's authorization of Federal civil damage actions against State entities, which may violate States' immunity under the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution." The administration also said that ENDA was result in unnecessary litigation.
For instance, the bill establishes liability for acting on "perceived"
sexual orientation, or "association" with individuals of a particular sexual orientation. If passed, H.R. 3685 is virtually certain to encourage burdensome litigation beyond the cases that the bill is intended to reach." In addition the White House said that provisions of ENDA "give Federal
statutory significance to same-sex marriage rights under State law. These provisions conflict with the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. The Administration strongly opposes any attempt to weaken this law, which is vital to defending the sanctity of marriage." The threatened veto is the latest in a series of problems ENDA has
encountered. It originally included all members of the LGBT community, but the bill's
author, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass) removed gender identity fearing the legislation might not get out of committee. The move angered most LGBT rights groups, many of whom accused Frank of
selling out transsexuals. Nevertheless, the revised bill passed the House Education and Labor
Committee last week on a 27 - 21 vote. (story)<http://365gay.com/Newscon07/10/101807enda.htm>Several committee Democrats, including presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich refused to support the measure without the inclusion of protections for trans people. Following the vote Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) proposed an amendment that
would reinstate gender identity and secured the support of House leadership to introduce it Wednesday when ENDA reaches the floor. (story<http://365gay.com/Newscon07/10/101707enda.htm> ) Frank and Baldwin are the only two out members of Congress.
Friday, Frank announced he would support the amendment and said he would
lobby for its passage. (story<http://365gay.com/Newscon07/10/101907frank.htm> ) ENDA, as currently worded, would make it illegal for employers to
discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in hiring, firing, promoting or paying an employee. There are, however, some notable exceptions. It does not cover small
businesses, churches and the uniformed members of the armed forces. The White House concerns suggest that ENDA could be used against faith-based
agencies and to seek domestic partner benefits from employers. The threatened veto is the second against LGBT legislation before Congress.
The other is the Matthew Shepard Hate Crime Act. That legislation has passed the House. The Senate version passed as an amendment to a military spending bill. The two versions are now in conference. October 22 !!Urgent Call to all Humans!!URGENT – IN LESS THAN 48 HOURS CONGRESS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADD PROTECTIONS FOR TRANSGENDER WORKERS IN THE FINAL ENDA.
TELL REP. McDermott TO SUPPORT THE BALDWIN AMENDMENT!
Congress will vote Wednesday on H.R. 3685, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). Representative Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) plans to offer an amendment to ENDA to add protections based on gender identity. This amendment is crucial! This is our last chance to get gender identity back into the bill. We need your help right away to make sure your representative supports the amendment. We've called and emailed, but now we're sending faxes to show we mean business. Send an automatic fax to Rep. McDermott in support of the Baldwin amendment to ENDA, to make sure gender identity is included in the bill. Once you've taken action, please forward this message to your friends and family to help us get the word out. This is a historic vote. For the first time ever, the House of Representatives is poised to vote on employment protections for the GLBT community. Help us make sure every member of the GLBT community is included in those protections. Thank you for all that you do. Warmly, October 21 Day of RemembranceAs many of us are likely aware, Monday, November 20th is the Transgender Day of Remembrance. I believe this is the 9th anniversary of this event and I was wondering if anyone who reads my blog has attended one of these?
For those who have never heard of this event, it's a time to gather together and remember our transgender brothers and sisters who have been killed by acts of violence.
In the years I've been attending, there is normally a candlelight reading of the list of homicide victims, and often some indication as to the official classification of the crime.
Here is a partial list which I will update with 2007's victims as I find the time... As always, our gratitude goes to Gwen Smith for her herculean efforts!! Edna Brown |
|
|